Friday, December 2, 2011

Become a Wikipedian


Asthma 
For this assignment I chose to analyze the Wikipedia article on Asthma. The reason I chose Asthma was because I have had Asthma since I was a young child, so I would like to think that I am fairly knowledgeable on the topic.  While looking through web page I found that most of the facts about Asthma were legitimate facts. I only found a few facts that were slightly off while the rest that I compared matched up, and seemed to be correct.

The first sight I used to compare resources was http://my.clevelandclinic.org the reason I chose this website was because after a little research about Cleveland Clinic it seemed to be a legitimate source. Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit organization dedicated to combining hospital care with education and research. Now according to Wikipedia Gastro esophageal Reflux disease or GERD is common in 80% of people who have Asthma. According to Wikipedia the reason for this is because of Asthmatic Medication, bronchoconstriction, and irritation. But according to Cleveland Clinicstudies have shown a relationship between asthma and GERD, the exact relationship is uncertain. GERD may worsen asthma symptoms, however asthma and some asthma medications may worsen GERD symptoms. On the other hand, treating GERD often helps to also relieve asthma symptoms, further suggesting a relationship between the two conditions.” So there is no actual known relationship between the two. I also used this website to compare to many facts on the Wikipedia page and most of them matched up.
            The second web site I used to check facts mayoclinic.com. I used this web site to check the Asthma medications that were listed on Wikipedia and again, the facts matched up with the medications listed on Mayo Clinic. I was a little confused on how Wikipedia referred to the most common medication for immediate relief as Salbutamol. In my personal experience with Asthma I have only herd the same medication being referred to as Albuterol. After a little research I realized that they are basically the same thing, just a different name. The more common name is Albuterol so I think it is a little confusing that Wikipedia refers to if as Salbutamol.
The final website I used to check facts was Medical News Today. Com, they had an article on the different types of Asthma. What I noticed while reading this article was that on the Wikipedia site they have different names for the same types referred to in the Medical News Today article, and Medical News Today mentions other types of Asthma that Wikipedia doesn’t mention at all.  
            All together I found the Wikipedia site to be mainly a good source and only one fact was partially incorrect the rest could have used a little more detail. I didn’t feel it was necessary for me to edit these facts myself, I don’t think it was serious information that was left out considering that Wikipedia try’s to show only the main points of a topic, rather than extensive detail. All and all I think this site gave good basic Asthma information
While doing this assignment I realized that Wikipedia is a valid source. I had an extremely hard time trying to find facts that didn’t match up on other websites. When I was working on this assignment it was extremely hard for me to find a topic. At first I thought that this assignment would be really easy, the reason I had this opinion was because of what I had learned from school. Wikipeada was not and expectable resources, because of this I simply ruled out the option of Wikipedia even in my own non- school related researches. The first time I actually used Wikipedia was when I was working on my Book V.S Movie assignment for this class, and it was only because the professor said it was acceptable so I wanted to try it out. I found that Wikipedia had a valid movie summery so I used it. 

While doing this assignment I researched many different topics. The first topic I chose was Asthma, and when I realized that all of the facts I checked on the topic were correct I decided to choose a different topic. I assumed that the reason that it was hard for me to find facts that did not add up was because Asthma is a medical condition and there aren’t many conflicting facts about it. After thinking about this I decided to research more controversial facts hoping I would find a bias. The next topic I chose was same-sex marriage, I thought for sure that researching this topic I would find incorrect or biased facts, though at first the article did seem biased after reading into it more I realized that it was simply just presenting the facts, and it represented both sides well. The next topic I chose was Capital Punishment; this again was a controversial topic. I spent hours researching this page and trying to find conflicting facts on multiple websites, but everything added up. Finally out of frustration of searching different topics I researched Extra Terrestrials for fun because I thought for sure there would be some crazy facts on there, but again I got the same unbiased factual view, After all of this stress  I settled on the topic I knew best which was Asthma, andI reached a conclusion that Wikipedia is mainly a valid source.
Now I am sure that there are Wikipedia articles that do not have all of the facts straight and I can hardly reach a broad assumption over researching four articles, but I did reach the conclusion that well searched and common topics probably are mostly legitimate. I can say that I am now a Wikipedian and that I think that Wikipedia should get more credit than it does. I wonder if other students had similar frustrations while working on this assignment.

1 comment:

  1. Wikipedia can be A source for research, but it should never be THE source. Using as you did, as one source to be checked by others, is the way to go.

    ReplyDelete